On Sun,  4 Apr 2010 22:52:53 +0100, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> This particular warning is harmless as we emit during the normal
> pinning process where the batch buffer requires more fences than is
> available without eviction. Only if we fail to evict enough fences does
> this become a problem, so include the requested number of fences in the
> ultimate *error* message.
> 
> v2: Remember to compile test even trial patches to remove warnings.

Care to rebase (and test) this one against -next?

Attachment: pgp0rTLa2AjfG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to