On 10-11-2014 15:39, Ted Gould wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 00:55 -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote: >> > Something fun was proposed: add randomization to it. So, we pick 10 out >> > of the top 25 committers. The picking is done randomly, where your >> > win-chance is proportional to your commit count (p = your #commits / >> > total #commits) >> >> That's an interesting idea. I wonder how the randomization would be >> handled to ensure fairness? > > I like the idea, and curious whether it wouldn't solve your #10 problem. > "Sure, I didn't do a lot, but I WON" type of thing. Solves the imposture > problem in an interesting way. I don't think that we need Vegas quality > randomization, I think the RAND() function from somone's spreadsheet > would be totally adequate :-)
The randomization is pretty straight-forward. Something like a ticket drawing system, where the number of tickets is equal to the person's number of commits. I'm sure we can find a website to do it for us btw. cheers, Johan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Inkscape-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
