On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 22:09 -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:47:04PM -0500, Ted Gould wrote: > > So I'd like to propose that we file the incontestability affidavits on > > the name and the logo, but not the slogan. I really like the slogan, but > > I don't think it's as important to the project overall. We should file > > maintenance on the slogan though. > > > > So I'd propose this motion: > > > > I move we file maintenance affidavits on all three marks (name, logo and > > slogan) and incontestability affidavits on the name and logo. Total > > would be $700. > > We need to come to a final decision on this soon, btw. > > Perhaps Jon or Mental would like to cast a vote? > > Otherwise, either Ted needs to vote for Josh's proposal, or Josh and Tav > need to vote for Ted's proposal. I'm fine any which way, but we need a > single decision.
I'm +1 on Josh's proposal, as well. Sorry, I didn't see it before I proposed one. Ted
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Inkscape-board mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-board
