> The main problem I'm aware of is that in the event of a "problem", > reiserfsck 1) can take a long time (like weeks) to complete, 2) > doesn't necessarily fix the problems. ext3 doesn't have these > problems.
Indeed, I've seen reiserfs do some very long fsck's, but I've seen the same out of ext3. But for a filesystem of 35 million mail files, I figure it's got to beat ext3 on performance, at least. ...But there don't seem to be any stats at this scale to support that. John -- John Madden Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
