David R Bosso wrote on 06/02/2006 21:56: > >>but unlike >>amavisd-new (which uses spamc/spamd unless I'm mistaken), it uses >>SpamAssassin's perl modules directly. > > You're mistaken there. Amavisd-new has the option to use the SA pearl > libs, that's how we run it here. See: > > <http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#features-performance>
Thanks very much for the correction, I wasn't aware of that feature. I have to admit though (and that is true for both amavisd-new and spampd) that using the perl modules directly doesn't add much performance over using the spamc/spamd combination. Especially when you also use networked tests (like DCC, razor, pyzor or DNSBLs). Anyway, I still don't like amavisd-new's spam report headers. Unless they also nowadays differ from what I saw about a year back when using the spamc/spamd kind of running the spam tests with amavisd-new. A matter of personal taste though. cu, sven ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
