> [ On Friday, May 27, 2005 at 10:18:07 (+0800), Justin wrote: ] >> Subject: Re: "losing" email after delivery to cyrus >> >> Obviously duplicatesuppression is enabled by default for a reason, so my >> question: how to best resolve this issue? If I disable this feature and >> allow duplicate messages to be delivered, then potentially that will >> cause more issues than currently exist. Leaving it unchanged is clearly >> not the answer, either. >> >> Can people with more experience than I shed some light on the best >> course of action, please? > > Find out why the incoming messages do not have unique message-IDs.
Outlook does it. It's a bug which Micro$oft has fixed in Exchange, instead of fixing it in Outlook. Exchange generates new message IDs for every message because Outlook sometimes sends duplicates. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;289593 http://www.kryogenix.org/days/2004/07/07/message > > They should. They do as long as you don't use Micro$oft software. Simon > > It really isn't very acceptable for anyone to be generating unique > messages which reuse old message-IDs. > > While duplicate delivery suppression isn't _necessary_, I find that it's > highly advantageous to have on a general-purpose mail server, and I've > never had any problem with it before (only compliments!). > > -- > Greg A. Woods > > H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secrets of the Weird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus > Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu > List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html > > --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
