Because of SpamCop's attitude towards autoresponders*, I wish to patch
the implementation of the SIEVE vacation extension so that it will
never respond to remote addresses.
>From looking at sieve/bc_eval.c, this actually seems pretty
straightforward to do; I can just add another test case to
shouldRespond().
There's a comment fairly early in shouldRespond:
/* Note: the domain-part of all addresses are canonicalized */
Does this mean that parse_address() is always going to return an
addr-spec, as per RFC2822 section 3.4.1?
Thanks,
James
* http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
