On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Etienne Goyer wrote: > The documentation is scattered and lacking on certain aspect (like, for > example, database maintenance and recovery) and sometime out-of-date. > The developper seem to favor ad-hoc documentation on a WiKi, which I > personnally can't wrap my mind around but YMMV.
If you have patches to the included documentation, they are more than welcome. The Wiki is a much faster method to distribute work on things like the FAQ. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456 Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper --- Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
