Ah, well. It was an idea. :-)

Thanks for all the help with this. I really appreciate it!

Will

--On Tuesday, 17 February, 2004 11:48 -0500 Rob Siemborski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, William K. Hardeman wrote:

Funny. I saw that in the IMSP server sources and didn't even twig that it
was "imap" instead of "imsp", otherwise I would have modified the server
sources.

Wouldn't it be better if this were filed as a bug with CMU and get the
service name changed in the server sources? That, to me, would seem to be
the better way to handle this going forward, since imap and imsp are two
different services.

That's the problem with a lack of standardization of this protocol.


Unfortuinately, *all* of the deployment is using "imap" as the service
name.  Changing this now will break *all* deployed software.

I'm not about to do that. At best, it could be made a config option.

-Rob

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456
Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper




-- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- William K. Hardeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wkh.org

The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new
discoveries, is not "Eureka!" (I found it!) but "That's funny ..."
               -- Isaac Asimov

Always listen to experts. They'll tell you what can't be done and why. Then
do it.
--Robert A. Heinlein
---
Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Reply via email to