On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Rob Siemborski wrote: > On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Igor Brezac wrote: > > > I think I found what is causing the problem or at least unpredicteble > > behavior. %r will have a value regardless of whether an application > > (imapd in this case) passes the realm to the auxprop. saslauthd auths do > > not work this way. This is also somewhat related to bug #2326. Why does > > serverFQDN need to be used to realm when user_realm is not available? > > I think this is mostly for backwards compatibility with saslauthd in early > SASLv2 versions. Also, DIGEST (atleast) needs a source for the realm.
Can we make this an option? > Our realm support in saslauthd has never been well tested and is likely > inconsistant with lots of things (including itself). I do not know about other saslauthd auth mechs, but ldap mech should handle realms properly. I know that pam is broken. -- Igor
