Hack? I am using the unix hierarchy separator.. so yes the users do look like [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the disk, but that has nothing to do with this issue.. And that's a standard part of cyrus so, i wouldn't consider it a hack anymore. I was remapping username at one point, but I am not now, as I am using the ldap auxprop so I can support digest-md5 authentication.
someone else e-mailed me directly the solution to the problem.. I had to set "recipient_delimiter = +" in postfix's main.cf.. and all works find now..well except for postfix lowercasing the mailbox name so I can't deliver to +Sent as it gets mapped to +sent.. but I can fix that one. On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 17:34, Ken Murchison wrote: > Edward Rudd wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 14:42, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > >>Edward Rudd wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I am currently using Cyrus IMAPd, > >> > >>Which version of Cyrus? > >> > > > > Cyrus 2.1.15 sorry > > > >> and postfix 1.1.12, using the virtual > >> > >>>mailer in postfix (via LDAP). I am wanting to try and get the "plus > >>>folder delivery" to work with this setup.. Currently users are mapped > >>>like this > >>>incoming e-mail => Cyrus mailbox name (with \\ escaping) > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] => [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>What's with the \\ escaping? > >> > > > > For postfix to deliver to the correct mailbox.. As the user's mailbox IS > > Are you using a virtdomains hack for 2.1.15 (so that use mailboxes look > like [EMAIL PROTECTED]), or are you just rewriting the incoming address? > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] so postfix has to have it escaped so it delivers to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to cyrus server instead of trying to "redeliver" it to > > user on mail server domain.com. -- Edward Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page <http://urkle.drip.ws/>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
