# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-07-13 09:39:53 -0400: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > ># [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-07-01 10:25:29 -0400: > > > >>Since I've heard bad things about Courier's standards complicance, I > > > > Care to share some details? > > Do a google groups search for the keywords "courier imap compliance" or > a search for "courier" where the author is "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and > you should get a handful of hits.
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-07-13 09:55:10 -0400: > > http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=Pine.LNX.4.50.0206050910320.6814-100000%40shiva0.cac.washington.edu Well, MrSam's reaction to Crispin's complaints is somewhat unfortunate even if he has my sympathy. While we're pointing fingers: although I intended to switch to Cyrus (for unrelated reasons) I ended up installing another Courier-IMAPd: much easier, better documented, and I got to avoid SASL: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=sasl+vulnerability&btnG=Google+Search BTW, is anyone of you on [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105687915100001&r=1&w=2 -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
