Darrell Berry wrote: > > We're just matching on the X-Spam-Level tag, and that seems ok for the > moment -- does anyone have more information on the numeric comparison > extension you mentioned? I'm sure there will come a day when we ned > something more fine-grained...
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-segmuller-sieve-relation-02.txt > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I guess slightly off-topic, but I was wondering if any folks on here > > are using SpamAssassin, and if so, what sort of Sieve scripts you're > > using on such tagged mail. I know that recent releases of Sieve have > > a numeric comparator. Are you using that somehow, or just a simple > > match on the > > "X-Spam-Level: ***" header? -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
