Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: >I am, thus, somewhat wary of adding SHUT_RDWR inconditionally. Maybe we >could add a runtime-option that very busy sites can set if they need even >faster socket recycling? > > That sounds like a good idea.
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process ... Ken Murchison
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Scott Adkins
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Ken Murchison
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process ... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process counting ... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process coun... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c process ... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c proc... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated master.c ... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Michael Bacon
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [PATCH] Updated mast... Ken Murchison