On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: > NOT contain CVS/ directories when 2.1.5 is released? Please? :-) > > I intentionally include the CVS directories (checked out as anonymous) > so that people can easily do a "cvs update" to the latest and greatest > code if they really want to. > > Why is it a problem?
Well, it causes trouble when importing the tarball (as 'upstream sources') to another CVS repository (such as the one I use for the Debian packages). But since you just gave me a good reason for those CVS dirs in the tarball, I don't think you should remove them just because of my request. I will repack the tarball without the CVS directories (and no other changes) for the Debian "original source" tarball, then. That will keep things smooth on my end. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh
