--On Wednesday, February 27, 2002 8:20 -0700 "Alec H. Peterson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well if you could point me in the direction of where said caching takes
> place I'd be happy to play with it myself and report back.
I've found where the caching was taking place and commented it out:
In 2.1.0, line 135 of seen_db.c:
/* if this is the db we've already opened, return it */
#if 0
if (seendb && !strcmp(seendb->user, user)) {
abortcurrent(seendb);
seendb->uniqueid = mailbox->uniqueid;
seendb->path = mailbox->path;
*seendbptr = seendb;
return 0;
}
#endif
The way I read it that's where they are reusing the old DB handle, so just
ignoring that jumps to the next part where they close the database and
re-open it. I have noticed some slightly slower performance, I'll report
if the seen issues are gone.
Alec
--
Alec H. Peterson -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief Technology Officer
Catbird Networks, http://www.catbird.com
