Hello,
I also have 2 return-path from the beginning :
Return-Path: <cyrus@nynaeve>
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: by mail.slortar.net (Postfix, from userid 102)
id 4D61372C006; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:27:47 +0100 (CET)
X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
Received: from lists2.andrew.cmu.edu (LISTS2.ANDREW.CMU.EDU [128.2.10.216])
by mail.slortar.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3832972C005
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 08:27:46 +0100 (CET)
The 2 are added by sieve, one when it comes to my mailing-lists account and
is forwarded to my main account, the 2nd one from my account when sieve
file it into the correct folder.
slortar.net is my domain, nynaeve is the name of my server
>From the little that I know
They don't seem to be a bother at all, they are added by the local delivery
agent when mail is already accepted and therefore there is no need to have
a return-path that is used by the MTA when, for example, local recipient
doesn't exist. Vacation should better used the from header ?
Maybe I am completly wrong ...
Regards
Luc
Mike Grommet said:
> Hmmm ok, I've gotten much closer...
>
> Actually, I got vacation to properly respond... but I'm not really
> happy with what is going on yet... mainly because I'm still seeing 2
> return paths but things at least work right...
>
> Part of my problem is that somehow on my machine, under my sendmail
> config files I have a
> mailer/cyrus.m4
>
> When I specified MAILER(cyrus) it was pulling in a bunch of definitions
> from there... In my sendmail .mc file, I had my own definition for the
> cyrus mailer, but the others were getting dumped in there too, and my
> guess is that sendmail was taking the first one... Here is the
> relevant part of my generated sendmail.cf... the last Mcyrus is mine,
> the others were just added from the cyrus.m4 file
>
> Well, I'm still getting multiple return paths, but they are just copies
> of each other... Still, I dont like having 2 of them, and this concerns
> me...
>
> Example Headers:
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Received: from elucidations.net ([64.9.213.129])
> From: "Mike Grommet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: blah
>
>
> I'm happy its working, don't get me wrong, I've working on this for way
> too long, but isnt the fact that I have to return paths a Really Bad
> Thing(tm) ?
>
> Any ideas where its coming from? Understanding is a good thing, yes?
>
>
