I am reading this now. These look excellent, this and rfc 1893 make these codes very clear and easy to understand.
You have my thanks :) Steve. On Friday 22 February 2002 14:38, you wrote: > From: Steve Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:51:12 +0000 > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Lawrence, > > This was working as 4.2.2 I have changed it to 5.2.2 & it is still > working. What difference should I expect to see or problems might I > experience with this as 4.2.2 > I am not familiar with what these codes represent, I would be grateful > if you will point to documentation for them (eg rfc, website, etc). > > It's unlikely that 4.2.2 will break anything, but it's not following > the standards. See RFC 2034. > > Larry
