On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 09:39:49AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > > I setup a basic vacation script but noticed that sieve send the reply using > > the domain name of the imap server which is not the same as the domain name > > on my email address. Ie: sieve sent [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is this at all configurable with sieve? > > This has been fixed in Cyrus 2.1.x. Whichever address (either envelope > or :addresses) matches one of those in the headers, is used as the > sender address for the reply.
That's good to hear. For now though I think I'm stuck on 2.0.16 as there was a lot of pain in getting it running. Once I can get a test server going and practice migration of data from 2.0.16 over to 2.1.x I'll switch. :) For 2.0.16 is it possible to use the sieve-address = addr-spec defined in section 2.4.2.3 of RFC along with vacation or will vacation ignore it anyway? > > And an even more general question, where are some good language references > > for sieve filters and vacation usage that don't read like an RFC paper :) > > http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/ Yeah.. been there. It's the best collection of sieve resources I've found but it's really not good for end users. If you look at procmail as an example there are many user driven FAQs, tips, and examples ready for use. Sieve docs seem to be lacking in this respect. Maybe the people over at CyuSoft can setup a FAQ page that lets users of sieve contribute stuff? Just a thought. -- Regards, Scott Russell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE. T/L 441-9289 / External 919-543-9289 http://bzimage.raleigh.ibm.com/webcam
