On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:32:13PM +0100, GOMBAS Gabor wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:51:59AM -0600, Gary Mills wrote: > > > I posted a patch recently that re-qualifies the envelope recipient > > with the same domain as used by the MTA. > > Not true, your patch does not have any clue about the domain used by > the MTA. What it does might be good for the most simple setups but > it's not general enough.
True if you set `servername' equal to the MTA's masquerade name in /etc/imapd.conf. > > The domain used to qualify the envelope recipient is taken from the > > `servername' configuration parameter, which defaults to the hostname > > of the server. > > You should at least create a new configuration parameter. In my case, > the name of the MTA is 'mail.inf.elte.hu', the name of the IMAP server > (and the value of the 'servername' configuration parameter) is > 'mailbox.inf.elte.hu', but both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses are invalid. Yes, I agree that a new configuration parameter would be better. I'd prefer to leave the name up to the developers, though. In my case, it serves the purpose. Sendmail masquerades `mail.cc.umanitoba.ca' and `smtp.cc.umanitoba.ca' to `cc.umanitoba.ca'. Cyrus sieve qualifies envelope recipients with `cc.umanitoba.ca', and sieve scripts work as documented. Users do _not_ need to specify their own address as an additonal address because sieve already knows it. > Also note that addresses of more than one virtual domains may map to the > same IMAP mailbox, so the parameter must be multi-valued. This is a more complicated case. Would multiple configuration files solve it? P.S. I've modified the `easysieve' web front-end so that it detects when the user redirects to his own address, and converts it to a `keep'. Source is at http://mail.cc.umanitoba.ca/source/ . -- -Gary Mills- -Unix Support- -U of M Academic Computing and Networking-
