> Regarding complaints from those who don't want to mess with different > software systems using different versions of SASL... DONT! Immediate > upgrades to the latest version are not compulsory. How many recent > messages start with "I'm running Cyrus 1.6.x on ...". If you have to > wait for sendmail and OpenLDAP to catch up, don't worry, they will. > I'd like to look at porting Postfix to SASL2 at some time shortly after Cyrus for SASL 2 comes out. Is there a porters guide someplace, or can someone post a summary of required steps?
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Pat Lashley
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Ken Murchison
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Pat Lashley
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Ken Murchison
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Pat Lashley
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Rob Siemborski
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL... Ken Murchison
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and ... Todd Nemanich
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and ... Jeremy Howard
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Christopher D. Audley
- OT? (was re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and ... Jeremy Howard
- OT? (was re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1... Tim Pushor
- Re: OT? (was re: [POLL] Cy... Lawrence Greenfield
- Re: OT? (was re: [POLL] Cy... Todd Nemanich
- Re: OT? (was re: [POLL] Cy... Jules Agee
- LDAP groups patch (was: OT... Todd Nemanich
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL... Rob Siemborski
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Christopher Wong
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Ken Murchison
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Rob Siemborski
- Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Rob Siemborski