Quoting Gary Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The previous patch that I submitted made sure that the envelope > recipient address of the message that triggers a vacation response had > the same domain name as the one used by the MTA. Today's patch > ensures that this same address will be used as the originator of the > response message. Taking it from the first additional address is not > a good idea, since the additional addresses are supplied by the user, > and may be incorrect. The result would be that the response message > would be unreplyable. The one with the domain specified by the > administrator is more likely to be correct. > > The patch is for sieve/script.c.
This has already been fixed in CVS. I uses whichever address (either envelope or :addresses) matches in th eone in the to/cc/bcc header. Ken -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
