Ken, I have no problem resetting SASL Admin passwords however, does this change to SASL V2 effect PAM authentication (kerberos, LDAP, etc.)?
Regards, Robert Beazley OCNS, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Murchison Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 1:54 PM To: Cyrus Mailing List Subject: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2 Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this for a number of reasons: 1. Take advantage of the benefits of SASL v2 (improvements in memory management, support for additional plugin types, simplified database support, and improved error reporting). 2. Take the lead in SASLv2 migration. Hopefully Sendmail, OpenLDAP, etc would soon follow. 3. SASL v2 and v1.5.x can peacefully co-exist on the same system. I've been running Sendmail 8.12.1/SASL 1.5.24 and Cyrus 2.1 CVS/SASL 2.0.4 CVS for weeks without any problems. 4. We would no longer have to maintain two Cyrus v2.1 source branches (developer benefit). 5. It WILL happen eventually, so why not now? The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the users passwords because they can not be extracted from the old sasldb (unless you have been using my APOP patch). As stated above, this will eventually have to be done, so why not now? We would like to get as much feedback (pro and con) on this as possible before we make a final decision. Thanks, Ken -- Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd. Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place 716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127 --PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
