My experience has been that cyrus fails over pretty clean. Depending on the number of users, it might not make sense to reconstuct the databases at a time of fail over.
Greg On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 02:10:47PM +0200, Klaus Jaehne wrote: > > We are going to set up a failover solution for a cyrus IMAP server with > two machines and a shared disk array (which holds a journaling file > system). Now I assume one machine has failed and the second one is taking > over the file system - is it safe to start cyrus on the second machine > immediately or must I run some command like reconstruct before to check > cyrus' consistency? Or can I run reconstruct after Cyrus has started up? I > suppose there other people on the list with a similar configuration, so > there must be some experience... ? > > -- > geetings, > Klaus J?hne > ________________________________________________________________________ > Thinking Objects Software GmbH, Lilienthalstr. 2, 70825 Stuttgart, DE > phone 49 711 88770 400, fax 449, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.to.com/ > ======================================================================== > Linux without limits: http://linux.s390.org/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
