Devdas Bhagat wrote:
> The problem with the current design of imapd is that it assumes that
> SASL will be available locally in some form, ignoring that it may not
> be available there.
> Do the pwcheck daemons provide support for this?

Yes. The pwcheck 'API' is this simple:
 - SASL sends username\0password\0 over a socket
 - The daemon sends back 'OK\0' or 'Incorrect password\0'

How the daemon decides on what response to return is completely open. For
instance, my pwcheck daemon contacts a MySQL server on a remote machine to
check the credentials.


Reply via email to