On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 19:31, Vegard Øye <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2011-07-23 08:15 +0200, Neeraj Sharma wrote:
>> Regarding dired mode, I do see its in emacs state by default but >> i find it somewhat confusing for the fingers to go back and forth >> between j/k (other modes) and n/p (dired). > Dired now comes up in Normal state by default (commit 9a44dbe). > As a modest starting point, I have added vi bindings for > "h", "j", "k" and "l", but left everything else untouched. >> On vim, I really like the NERDTREE shortcuts so replicating those >> is what comes to my mind. > > That is an interesting suggestion. Since you are used to NERDTree's > shortcuts, what are the biggest differences between them and Dired's? I would really like to avoid having this enter Evil. If you want to add NERDTree-specific mappings to Dired mode, then by all means add them to your .emacs, but keep them out of Evil. I don’t want to have to learn NERDTree for Vim to be able to use Dired for Emacs. Learning to use Dired while working inside Emacs makes a lot more sense to me. I mean, it’s already documented. If, however, there are clashes between Dired mappings and Evil movement mappings, then they need to be resolved and looking at NERDTree for suggestions might make sense in this case. _______________________________________________ implementations-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementations-list
