Note that the IETF patent policy is very close to W3C's RAND.
Just because we ALLOW patented technology does not mean we LIKE it, or that
we won't take alternate action when possible. But at times (RARELY!), the
alternative of doing without is worse than the alternative of standardizing
technology that embraces a patent for which money must be paid.
Note: There are companies (the guys behind RTLinux come to mind) that hold
patents, but grant a free license to people using the patent in GPL-covered
software, or non-commercial software, or any number of other situations
where there is no money to be recovered anyway.
Not all Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory policies are created equal.
Harald
--On mandag, oktober 01, 2001 09:50:32 +1200 Franck Martin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is outrageous as it will stop the development of opensource software.
>
> If the W3C needs money, then they should look from their sponsors. I hope
> this won't affect IETF, and that Internet Standard won't become closed,
> open only to the RICH countries and RICH people (talk about digital
> divide!). If W3C goes in this move, then I suggest that IETF bring back
> the HTML standards back into the IETF.
>
> Franck Martin
> Network and Database Development Officer
> SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
> Fiji
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Web site: http://www.sopac.org/
> <http://www.sopac.org/> Support FMaps: http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/
> <http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/>
>
> This e-mail is intended for its addresses only. Do not forward this e-mail
> without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be
> necessarily the views of SOPAC.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shirley Tseng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 1 October 2001 5:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: W3C Fee based Patent Policy - RAND
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Was this discussed by the IETF or via the IETF/W3C liaison committee? I
> didn't see it in the archive. The review period ends today!
>
> A summary at http://www.openphd.net/W3C_Patent_Policy/
> W3C Patent Policy
> W3C and the Promotion of Fee-based Standards for the Web
>
> last call review period closes on 30 September 2001
>
> Comment archives are at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-patentpolicy-comment/
>
> The Working Draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/patent-policy/) (reproduced in the
> Patent Policy Frequently Asked Questions,
> http://www.w3.org/2001/08/16-PP-FAQ) also states that RAND allows for
> licensing audits (RAND "may include reasonable, customary terms relating
> to operation or maintenance of the license relationship such as the
> following: audit (when relevant to fees), choice of law, and dispute
> resolution.")
>
>
> Shirley Tseng
> Infinite Global Infrastructures
> www.igillc.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -
> This message was passed through [EMAIL PROTECTED], which
> is a sublist of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all messages are passed.
> Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.
>
