Joe Touch wrote:
...
> > Speaking of keeping standards, I am wondering why STD-2
> > is still RFC-1700, although the current version is kept by
> > IANA at http://www.iana.org/numbers.htm .
>
> Very good question. I'll be glad to raise the issue with IANA;
> at least 1700 and STD-2 should be obsoleted in their current form.
afaik nothing in 1700 has been rescinded, so it isn't obsolete;
it's simply updated by http://www.iana.org/numbers.htm
IANA can't change the status of an STD - that's an IESG action.
If you think this matters, I would raise it with the latter.
Brian
