In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Garrett Wollman typed : >>Which is, of course, how anonymizing services achieve most of their >>value. If only one person is using an anonymizer, then they are still >>effectively traceable. If, on the other hand, that one person is >>mixed in with 140,000 other requests [an actual number] then they are >>more likely to be anonymous. even better if you don't identify how MANY other people they are mixed in with - then if there are n anonymizers, the attackers can't identift the weakest one to attack first cheers jon [an actual name]
- RE: The Internet and the Law, the ... Christian Huitema
- 3GPP IPv6 identifiers (RE: Th... Harald Alvestrand
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Keith Moore
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The Internet and the Law,... Perry E. Metzger
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Greg Minshall
- Re: The Internet and the Law,... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Marc Horowitz
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Garrett Wollman
- Re: The Internet and the Law,... Jon Crowcroft
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Keith Moore
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Stephen Sprunk
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Keith Moore
- Re: The Internet and the Law, the ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: The Internet and the Law,... Keith Moore
