"David R. Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Only transit providers (whatever they are) should be getting v6
> addresses from the registries.
Since deployment seems to be based initially upon virtual
topologies that are disjoint from the underlying IPv4
topology (i.e., using tunnels), surely anyone who is open
to allowing other sites to connect to their virtual
topology should be eligible for address space?
Sean.
- RE: PAT Lillian Komlossy
- RE: PAT Brian . Rubarts
- Re: PAT Keith Moore
- Re: PAT Michael Richardson
- Re: PAT Keith Moore
- Re: PAT Michael Richardson
- Re: PAT David R. Conrad
- getting IPv6 space without AR... Michael Richardson
- Re: getting IPv6 space withou... David R. Conrad
- Re: getting IPv6 space withou... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: getting IPv6 space withou... Sean Doran
- Re: getting IPv6 space withou... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: getting IPv6 space withou... Michael Richardson
- PAT Peter Burggasser
