Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

[Thomas Narten]

> Oh, goody, another round of wasted time and energy arguing about
> IPv6 and NAT boxes on the IETF list

So it seems. Too bad you couldn't just leave it at that without adding
another dose of gasoline to the mix.

Meanwhile, those of us who believe IPv6 is the best and most promising
way out of this mess will continue to work on actually making it
happen. Of course, if someone has a better idea, I'd surely love to
read the draft.

Thomas