>it's completely natural that people will try such approaches - >they are trying to address real problems and they want quick >solutions to those problems. In particular, they will try such approaches if they are not presented with better alternatives. >but if the quick fix solutions get entrenched then they cause >their own set of problems which are worse then the original >problems. this is not progress. Progress is created by the development of solutions that do not cause their own set of problems. This does not happen merely by condemning other less desirable solutions. It happens by presenting a better alternative. >- indicators that there is an important problem that needs to be > solved in a technically sound fashion If this mail thread is any indication, I'd say the indicator is shining brightly.
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Martin J.G. Williams
- Re: recommendation against publication of draft-cerpa... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: recommendation against publication of draft-... ned . freed
- Re: recommendation against publication of dr... Dave Crocker
- Re: recommendation against publication o... ned . freed
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Dave Crocker
- Re: recommendation against publication o... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Dick St.Peters
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Bernard Aboba
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Erik Fair
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Brian E Carpenter
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Scott Brim
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Keith Moore
- Re: breaking the IP model (or not) Scott Brim
- Re: recommendation against publication o... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: recommendation against publicati... Keith Moore
