The objections I've seen so far to this draft specifically cite
problems from systems such as "transparent web proxies" (which are, in
my experience, usually far from transparent) in the network which
intercept all traffic, regardless of destination address, sent to
specific well-known ports.
A quick read through draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt suggests that it's
primarily targeted at forms of redirection which occur at the request
of service operators. Such systems are best thought of as a funny
kind of application-layer proxy, and are far less damaging to the
end-to-end internet model than the transparent proxies cited above.
I think it's important to carefully distinguish between these sorts of
redirection. Some clarifying text in the draft to this effect would
be helpful.
- Bill
- Re: recommendatio... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendatio... Stephen Kent
- Re: recommendation against publica... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against pub... Stephen Kent
- Re: recommendation against... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publication... Peter Deutsch
- Re: recommendation against publica... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against pub... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: recommendation against pub... Peter Deutsch
- Re: recommendation against... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publica... Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: recommendation against pub... Patrik F�ltstr�m
- Re: recommendation against publication of d... Vernon Schryver
- Re: recommendation against publication... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: recommendation against publication of d... Vernon Schryver
- RE: recommendation against publication of d... Christian Huitema
- RE: recommendation against publication... Stephen Kent
- RE: recommendation against publication of d... Ian King
- Re: recommendation against publication of d... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
- Re: recommendation against publication... Keith Moore
- Re: recommendation against publica... Peter Deutsch in Mountain View
