> It seems to me that we may be able to recapture some aspects of end-to-end > transparency at the application level if addressing issues are focused on > host FQDNs, rather than IP addresses. Forget about it. Many of the same folks doing NAT also do a two-faced DNS which hides most of their names from the outside. So a host inside such a site has no more idea of its global name than of its global address.
- To address or NAT to address? Graham Klyne
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Matt Crawford
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Keith Moore
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Cary FitzGerald
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to addr... Keith Moore
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Christian Huitema
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: To address or NAT to address? David R. Conrad
- Re: To address or NAT to address? Brian E Carpenter
- Re: To address or NAT to addr... Yakov Rekhter
