Jens Petersen wrote:
[...] To summarize, basically the problem is that the package
version may end up being versioned at 0.0 unless upstream
(ie the Hugs maintainers here) agree to some improved
(machine friendly) version numbering scheme like YYYYMM
instead. [...]
I would be even more happy with the common major.minor numbering scheme,
with the usual even (= stable) / odd (= unstable) distinction of the minor
version number, see e.g. the Linux kernel, GHC,... Ross, Sigbjorn?
Cheers,
S.
_______________________________________________
Hugs-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hugs-users
