On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Geoff Hutchison wrote:
> Also, as I was trimming out the translate_* attributes yesterday, I
> remembered Hans-Peter's uncoded_db_compatible attribute. I think we
> should get rid of this too--there's no way to produce a database for
> 3.2 without having that code available. We've completely broken
> backwards compatibility anyway, so I think it's a moot point.
Yes, yes. That attribute was always too good for this world. :-)
I think compatibility broke in more than one place soon after I added that
attribute, and right now it just makes a false impression that there's any
backward-compatibility support that can be turned on and off with an
attribute.
> Does this sound OK?
Definitely. Right on.
brgds, H-P
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
