J. op den Brouw writes:
>
> A bit late :)
>
> It seems that om my HP-UX box, the call to the shared lib _init() routine
> is not made. I'm not sure why it isn't called, but when I compile with -g
> and shared lib, gdb cannot find the ::_init() routine. When I compile
> without shared lib, it can.
Hi,
I'll try with Solaris-2.6 next week since it apparently has a similar problem.
It would help if you could run the libtool test suite on your system.
Just get libtool-1.3.3, make ; make check. It should show the following:
PASS: cdemo-static.test
PASS: cdemo-make.test
PASS: cdemo-exec.test
PASS: demo-static.test
PASS: demo-make.test
PASS: demo-exec.test
PASS: demo-inst.test
PASS: demo-unst.test
PASS: mdemo-static.test
PASS: mdemo-make.test
PASS: mdemo-exec.test
PASS: mdemo-inst.test
PASS: mdemo-unst.test
PASS: cdemo-conf.test
PASS: cdemo-make.test
PASS: cdemo-exec.test
PASS: demo-conf.test
PASS: demo-make.test
PASS: demo-exec.test
PASS: demo-inst.test
PASS: demo-unst.test
PASS: deplibs.test
PASS: mdemo-conf.test
PASS: mdemo-make.test
PASS: mdemo-exec.test
PASS: mdemo-inst.test
PASS: mdemo-unst.test
PASS: dryrun.test
PASS: demo-nofast.test
PASS: demo-make.test
PASS: demo-exec.test
PASS: demo-inst.test
PASS: demo-unst.test
PASS: cdemo-shared.test
PASS: cdemo-make.test
PASS: cdemo-exec.test
PASS: demo-shared.test
PASS: demo-make.test
PASS: demo-exec.test
PASS: demo-inst.test
PASS: hardcode.test
PASS: build-relink.test
PASS: noinst-link.test
PASS: demo-unst.test
PASS: mdemo-shared.test
PASS: mdemo-make.test
PASS: mdemo-exec.test
PASS: mdemo-inst.test
PASS: mdemo-unst.test
PASS: assign.test
PASS: link.test
PASS: link-2.test
PASS: nomode.test
PASS: quote.test
PASS: sh.test
PASS: suffix.test
===================
All 56 tests passed
===================
From the documentation I see:
-------------------------------------------------------
canonical host name compiler libtool results
(tools versions) release
-------------------------------------------------------
hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20 cc 1.3.2 ok
hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 gcc 1.2f ok
hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 cc 1.2f ok
could you tell which one is yours ? hppa2.0, I guess and gcc
if I remember well. Anyway, it's a good hint about the fact that it
may not be a straight libtool failure.
In the Writing libraries for C++ chapter of the libtool documentation
the following is mentionned:
2. On some systems, the C++ compiler must take special actions for the
dynamic linker to run dynamic (i.e., run-time) initializers. This
means that we should not call `ld' directly to link such
libraries, and we should use the C++ compiler instead.
This may also be a compiler issue. I rapidly checked in the HPPA section
of gcc-2.95 but found nothing. I should probably dig the gcc mailing lists
or deja.com when I'll be back to fast connectivity ;-)
Can you check if htdig link (for instance) is done with the compiler
or the linker alone ?
Cheers,
--
Loic Dachary
24 av Secretan
75019 Paris
Tel: 33 1 42 45 09 16
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.senga.org/
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
