>
> The code also doesn't seem to make use of WORD_NORMALIZE_NUMBER. Does it
> matter? Right now, numbers are rejected as WORD_NORMALIZE_NOALPHA if
> allow_numbers is false. However, I think the individual status bits are
> only checked when explaining why entries from bad_word_list are rejected.
> So, I don't think there's much point to having a WORD_NORMALIZE_NUMBER
> bit.
I agree. If you'd like to remove it, I see no problem. It would be nice
to differenciate NOALPHA and NUMBER but since it's not a bug we might as
well kill the flag so that nobody is misleaded.
Thanks for the analysis :-)
--
Loic Dachary
24 av Secretan
75019 Paris
Tel: 33 1 42 45 09 16
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL: http://www.senga.org/
------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the htdig3-dev mailing list, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You will receive a message to confirm this.
