Rob van Dam wrote:
> Brian Cheeseman schreef:
>
>> Rob,
>> I've just done some more research and found some chatter on one of the
>> uClibc mailing lists where they propose a couple of solutions which is
>> pretty much where we have already gotten to. ie patch gettext or patch
>> uClibc. I also found a patch on these mailing lists to re-enable the
>> allocation of the 4 bytes for the pointer in the uClibc codebase and
>> they seem happy enough about it.
>>
>> Attached is the patch in question. it will work against 0.9.29. It
>> should be noted that if this patch is applied to uClibc that the
>> previous patch I sent around for gettext will not be needed as MUST NOT
>> be applied as they will conflict on the memory location of the variable.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brian.
>>
>>
> Hi Brian,
> That makes also 2 patches for uClibc. Because this patch comes from
> uClibc I think this is the preferred way.
>
> I am very curious what the hlfs maintainers think about this issue, but
> it's very quiet from that side. Considering the date it could be they
> are on a well deserved vacation :-)
>
> Rob
>
Then we will have done some nice work for them and proven the value of
the open source community.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
