>From the fountain in the SW corner of Lake Geneva, you can estimate the
time of day and the wind strength & direction.
Victor


On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 18:42, Hannes Röst <[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Jeff
>
> Thanks so much for your enthusiasm, your response time is fantastic!
>
> I like PicLayer but using only 3 points I could never get the map to align
> properly (which is a defect of the map for sure). It works well for maps
> that are drawn more recently and dont need warping, e.g building outlines
> or archeological dig site maps.
>
> PS: if you love these ortho layes, you will love these
>
> photos:
> https://map.geo.admin.ch/?lang=de&topic=swisstopo&bgLayer=voidLayer&X=185466.05&Y=647539.98&zoom=1&layers=ch.swisstopo.swissimage-product&time=1979&layers_timestamp=1979&catalogNodes=1430
>
> maps:
> https://map.geo.admin.ch/?topic=swisstopo&zoom=2&lang=de&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&catalogNodes=1392&layers=ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen&time=1864&layers_timestamp=18641231&E=2665750.00&N=1208625.00
>
>
> (from here
> https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/de/online/maps-online/journey-images.html
> ) unfortunately these are clearly not under a free license
>
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 13. Juli 2020 um 11:57 Uhr
> *Von:* "Jeff Meyer" <[email protected]>
> *An:* "Hannes Röst" <[email protected]>
> *Cc:* "Open Historical Map" <[email protected]>
> *Betreff:* Re: [OHM] Available background layers in editor
> Hi Hannes -
>
> I LOVE these layers. Thank you!!!
>
> This tweet contains diagrams that show how to add those layers (1 at a
> time) to iD: https://twitter.com/OpenHistMap/status/1279135482283085824
>
> The general problem you're describing (not having cool historic
> baselayers automatically show up in iD) could be solved by having an
> OHM-specific Editor Layer Index (
> https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index) & having OHM's iD point at
> that. That's a brilliant idea. I've opened a ticket to do just that. It
> might actually be relatively easy, but "easy" things rarely are & still
> take work. : )  (https://github.com/OpenHistoricalMap/issues/issues/122)
> A cool side note: ELI works in JOSM with a small preference setting change.
> 2 for the price of 1.
>
> And, THANK YOU for editing the Wiki page. Fortune favors the bold, my
> friend!
> (Piclayer can indeed be fussy, but with a little practice, it's pretty
> cool)
>
> Those Orthos are quite cool, as well.
>
> These are all awesome & exciting suggestions - I encourage others to share
> their thoughts and experiences and to check out Hannes' links.
>
> : )
> Jeff
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:55 PM Hannes Röst <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Jeff and others
>>
>> Currently the default iD editor seems to have the same background
>> layers available as OSM and I currently dont see any customization for
>> OHM. I think it would be cool to have a few pre-set options to choose
>> from to get people started. I know this can be configured to be region
>> specific (for example if I go to Switzerland, Thurgau then the "Kanton
>> Thurgau OF 2017" shows up but nowhere else since these fotos are only
>> there for Thurgau) so it would be great to collect a bunch of
>> background tiles one could use.
>>
>> Digital Atlas of the Roman Empire (DARE):
>> https://dh.gu.se/tiles/imperium/{z}/{x}/{y}.png  (CC BY 4.0, Europe
>> specific)
>> Sulzberger map:
>> http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps/tile/3271/{z}/{x}/{y}.png  (CC0,
>> location-specific)
>>
>> I think this could help "newbies" quite a bit and give them a cool
>> place to start mapping. It could also help with attribution since we
>> could store what source information was used for each object and edit.
>> The least we could do is collect a few "interesting" layers on the
>> wiki and help newbies to get started.
>>
>> Of course eventually this could be location and time-period specific
>> and the "right" background map could just show up "magically" on the
>> right side for mapping.
>>
>> I know that this functionality already exists on the Warper side (eg
>> http://warper.wmflabs.org/maps//3271#Trace_tab) but there are more
>> maps out there then what Warper has and some countries provide tiles
>> for historic maps. Have you previously thought about that?
>>
>> Secondly, it took me some time (and struggling with the very limited
>> PicLayer JOSM plugging that can only use 3 control points and seems to
>> do very limited warping) to actually find the Warper and the wiki page
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapWarper is only mentioned once
>> in a long list of tools. I was bold and added this workflow to the
>> wiki page myself:
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map#How_to_trace_a_historic_map_in_OHM
>> for other to find more easily
>>
>> Thirdly, just to bother you more with my usecase: the Swiss Cantons
>> provide access to Orthofotos layers and they have them historic!
>> (yay!). Now that may be a cool usecase for this to play around:
>> https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Maps/Switzerland - for example grab
>> the
>>
>> Kanton Glarus Orthophoto 2013 {view}
>> Kanton Glarus Orthophoto 2015 {view}
>> Kanton Glarus Orthophoto 2017 {view}
>>
>> and you have historic 4 years of Orthophoto (Switzerland has these
>> going back to the 70s but probably not all under suitable licence).
>>
>>
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Hannes
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Historic mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Meyer
> 206-676-2347
> osm: Open Historical Map (OHM)
> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map> / my OSM user
> page <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/jeffmeyer>
> t: @OpenHistMap
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Historic mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
> _______________________________________________
> Historic mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
>
_______________________________________________
Historic mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic

Reply via email to