Maps Warpers mask feature can deal with those map borders ;-) Here is the OHM instance of TM: https://github.com/Abbe98/osm-tasking-manager2/tree/RPA-wetlands
Everything should be working except, making queries directly to OHM using the Overpass Turbo link, it's possible using some data setting in the URL but I haven't used it recently. Some string could say OpenStreetMap in some places to but most of them should be right. For OAuth I created an app "RPA - Wetlands" it's "Main Application URL" is set to the Github repo but as far as I remember this won't be an issue at least not when running it locally. // Albin 2015-10-29 21:17 GMT+01:00 Sanjay Seth <[email protected]>: > That was quick! Looking forward to test driving the TM tomorrow. Thanks > for jumping in on this, Albin. > > The good thing about the maps we have chosen is that, based on the 1830 to > 1850 time period, there isn't significant overlap of map content. However, > there are overlapping borders that do need to be cropped out. > > I am hesitant to use Map Warper for these historic maps, as the features > on the map are mostly natural. But I could be convinced. Here's our current > methodology for georeferencing: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/g2fz8ti9npmbh30/Tutorial_and_Methodology_for_Mapping_Historic_Wetlands.pdf?dl=0 > > These are all of the maps we are going to georeference from the NY metro > region: > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/q73vhjrnj0e1lbf/AADTjbuSbYM7n2JgtWLG-vOya?dl=0 > > This is a map RPA created in 2003 that looks at many of the historic > wetlands in the NY/NJ Harbor, from a single British survey map: > https://www.dropbox.com/s/pc0p9i6nlvfs1tm/RPA_Historic_TIdelands_NYNJ_Harbor_Estuary.jpg?dl=0 > > And here are some examples of georeferenced maps (Tif): > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xe0naanoabdtavt/AACiPDiUyGJA6LbrOjIOpqO2a?dl=0 > > In order to create a draft TMS, I uploaded the individually referenced > maps as GeoTIFFs into TileMill, combined into a single map, and was able to > export a single map in a TMS format. > > However, ideally to make this scalable beyond the New York metro region, > we would want to use something like MapWarper to make it easy for others to > georeference other geographies or times series. > > Thoughts? > > Thanks! -s > > > Sanjay Seth | Research Analyst > (917) 546-4327 | www.rpa.org > Regional Plan Association > ________________________________________ > From: Albin Larsson [[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:51 PM > To: SK53 > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OHM] Building Infrastructure for OHM – RPA Historic > Wetland Mapping > > But that wouldn't work if the maps overlap? Such as maps over the same > area but for different time periods. > > I got an instance of TM up and running against OHM, will probably find > some issues but is published my code later tonight. > > // > Albin > > You need to look at what Donal Diamond (IrlJdel) does for the GSGS3906 > maps which are individually warped on map warper, but pulled together in a > single TMS layer. > > Example individual map TMS: > http://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/11180/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png< > http://mapwarper.net/maps/tile/11180/%7Bzoom%7D/%7Bx%7D/%7By%7D.png> > Combined TMS: tms[18]: > http://mapwarper.net/layers/tile/101/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png< > http://mapwarper.net/layers/tile/101/%7Bzoom%7D/%7Bx%7D/%7By%7D.png> > > I don't know what magic is involved, but it works. > > Jerry > > On 29 October 2015 at 19:20, Albin Larsson <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > 3000 maps is a bit of a issue, iD API for custom TMS layer only support > one at a time, and I guess that those 3000 maps is overlapping too? For > example the HOT TM has one TMS layer for each project, something that > wouldn't work in this case. > > I see two possible solutions for this, one is to add the link to each > relevant TMS layer in the task description, this would be a lot of manual > work. Another and probably better solution is to add all maps to iDs > imagery index, currently there is less then 200 maps there, I'm not sure > about how much 3000 maps would affect performance... This solution requires > that all maps has bounding boxes. Maybe I would need to setup a custom iD > instance too... > > // > Albin > > > 2015-10-29 20:03 GMT+01:00 Steven Johnson <[email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>>: > Hi Albin, > I think that's essentially the task, but instead of invoking > openstreetmap, the TM would instead point to OHM. Awesome if you can stand > up a new instance! > Thanks, > > -- SEJ > -- twitter: @geomantic > -- skype: sejohnson8 > > There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate > from incomplete data. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Albin Larsson <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I'm looking into it, shouldn't take much time at all to setup. Just > setting up a new TM instance connected to OpenHistoricalMap? > > // > Albin > > On Oct 29, 2015 19:32, "Sanjay Seth" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > wrote: > Hi folks – > > I had sent around an email about a month ago about a project at RPA ( > www.rpa.org<http://www.rpa.org>) to map the historic wetlands of the New > York metropolitan region from the 1830’s - 1850’s, as part of our research > on climate adaptation. (See email chain below for details). > > The project has started to take off. We have had a great response from the > community so far – and have partnered with Steven Johnson at TeachOSM and > others to shepherd this mapping effort. Through this project, we hope to > build out some of the infrastructure that would help the OHM community > continue to grow. > > For this project, we will need a Tasking Manager that is connected to OHM. > We could build off the TeachOSM TM by overriding the default iD link for > each job – or set up an entirely separate TM for OHM. I think the latter > may be a better option. Is there other infrastructure OHM needs to move > forward that could fit in the scope of this project? (I have a modest > amount of funding that I could use to defray some of the cost of > development time. Can anyone on this list point me in the direction of > someone who would be willing to get an OHM-connected TM up and running?) > > I look forward to hearing any comments, questions, ideas, suggestions from > you about this project as it moves forward – and to gauge your interest in > the project as a whole. If you would like to be involved in this project, > please feel free to contact either myself ([email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>) or Steven ([email protected]<mailto: > [email protected]>). > > Thanks! > Sanjay > > Sanjay Seth | Research Analyst > (917) 546-4327<tel:%28917%29%20546-4327> | www.rpa.org<http://www.rpa.org> > Regional Plan Association > _______________________________________________ > Historic mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic > > _______________________________________________ > Historic mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Historic mailing list > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials > cloud email security - click here< > https://us1.proofpointessentials.com/index01.php?mod_id=11&mod_option=logitem&mid=762151066&rid=48209320&report=1> > to report this email as spam. >
_______________________________________________ Historic mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/historic
