Hi, for what it's worth, I would ok with experimental status due to lack of PFS but I believe Robert would disagree.
ti, 2021-06-29 kello 07:19 +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) kirjoitti: > I meant experimental and not informational (sorry about any > confusion) > > -éric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Miika Komu <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, 29 June 2021 at 09:10 > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, " > [email protected]" <[email protected]>, Gonzalo Camarillo < > [email protected]>, Eric Vyncke <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Future of draft-ietf-hip-dex > > Hi Eric, > > I know Robert is going for standards track but is experimental > track > out of question? Maybe informal is not so good because the draft > specifies an actual protocol. > > Besides this, most of discuss points require Robert's expertise. > > ma, 2021-06-28 kello 13:51 +0000, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) > kirjoitti: > > In the absence of reaction on draft-ietf-hip-dex being back to > the > > HIP WG, let me explain its current status. > > > > The draft-ietf-hip-dex draft has not been accepted by the IESG > in > > March 2021 and has been sent back to the HIP WG in order to > address > > multiple DISCUSS blocking points raised by the IESG... A change > of > > intended status to 'informal' could also help the publication > as well > > as strong argumentation that DEX is actually required on > constrained > > devices in 2021. > > > > What is the plan of the authors and of the HIP WG on this topic > ? > > Declaring the I-D dead is also possible of course. But, the I-D > > should not stay in the limbo forever. > > > > Regards > > > > -éric > > > > > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
