Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-hip-dex-24: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-dex/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, Security and constrained devices are both outside my knowledge area, but I note that this document has been in development for a long time, and I wonder whether the axioms under which it was originally specified are still valid, and whether they will continue to hold to be valid in the short/medium term. For example, this document references the ZWAVE 500 chip, but it looks like that technology is already being replaced by the ZWAVE 700 chip that is smaller, faster, uses less power, and plausible looks like it has more hardware support for crypto. Hence, I just want to check that this specification still has value in being published now, but I have not formal objection. Regards, Rob _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
