Hi Martin,

ke, 2020-07-15 kello 23:16 -0700, Martin Duke via Datatracker
kirjoitti:
> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-31: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> DISCUSS:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> 
> Sec 4.2 and 4.6.2 specify a minimum of RTO of 500ms. There’s no way
> you would
> know this,  but draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider is close to IESG
> approval and
> specifies a minimum of 1 second without more information about the
> path. I
> would prefer that we change these minimums but perhaps there’s a
> compelling
> reason for 500ms?

just to be sure, we're talking about UDP tunnels here. 500 ms is what
ICE uses and I believe QUIC (?) has maybe even more aggressive values?

Anyway, I have changed the value to 1000 ms as you requested and added 
draft-ietf-tcpm-rto-consider as normative reference.

>  RFC 5770 is a normative downref. I couldn’t find indication the
> procedures in
>  RFC 3967 or 4897 were followed to address this. One solution would
> be to
>  downgrade this document to Experimental.

now it's Experimental:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-32

> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> COMMENT:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> 
> Thank you for an easy-to-read document.

thanks for your comments!
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

Reply via email to