Ver 14 of HIP mobility addresses my concerns.
Tom, thank you for making the change to clarify the draft.
Bob
On 10/10/2016 08:22 PM, Tom Henderson wrote:
The new versions of the HIP mobility and multihoming drafts address
various review comments received during IESG reviews.
Besides editorial changes, the following changes were made to RFC
5206-bis version 14:
* Replace references to 'middleboxes' with more specific |'NATs and
firewalls' and make reference to RFC 5207
* Describe a simple heuristic for setting the credit value for
Credit-Based Authorization based on sending rate and RTT.
* Add subsection about privacy concerns of locator exposure to the
Security Considerations section.
* Clarify that a host must be able to receive and avoid reprocessing
redundant LOCATOR_SET parameters that may have been sent in parallel
to multiple addresses of the host.
* Clarify that multicast or broadcast addresses must not be announced
in a LOCATOR_SET.
and the following to the multihoming draft version 12:
* Added section about locator privacy concerns ! to the Security
Considerations section.
* Added section about relationship to split tunnel issues to the
Security Considerations section.
I believe that all outstanding comments and issues have been addressed.
- Tom
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
