On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 06:26:07PM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote: > Still for productivity's sake, output is better than no output. > This is especially important for large works, where the author > does not want complete failure because of some inconsistency.
It really depends. In particular for automatic generation, in Makefile, no document, I think, is better than a document if it failed. When calling manually texi2any, it seems to me that it is better if there is systematically an output. > I suggest a variable that can be used for strict checking. I do not understand that one. In general texi2any does strict checking, and the output can be silenced with --no-warn. -- Pat
