Hi Gavin! Sorry for the delays…
> Le 12 nov. 2018 à 21:28, Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 06:41:02PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I was searching about conflicts in Bison on the web, and saw this: >> >> >> >> « Understanding » is quite not a nice title, so I clicked to check, and got >> this: >> > > Where did you see « Understanding »? I saw it on the Google’s page, as was represented in the screen capture I sent. Right now, on « bison conflicts », I get: Understanding (Bison 3.2.1) - GNU.org www.gnu.org/s/bison/manual/html_node/Understanding.html As documented elsewhere (see The Bison Parser Algorithm) Bison parsers are ... useless: STR; ^^^^^^^ calc.y: warning: 7 shift/reduce conflicts [-Wconflicts-sr]. >> Is there a means to use the section name rather that the node name in the >> generated HTML? It???s quite common to have a very short node name, but a >> fully blown section name, so the latter seems more appropriate to me. >> >> Even in Texinfo???s own documentation, you have for instance the title « One >> argument », which hardly makes sense alone: >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/One-Argument.html >> >> but the page is >> >> 6.4.1 @xref with One Argument > > The URL of the page has to follow the node name so that other pages can > link to it. Sorry for not being clear: I was not referring in any way to the URL, I’m talking about the <title></title> of the page. > I see on > https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/manual/texinfo/html_node/_0040xref.html#g_t_0040xref > the link to the page is labelled "One argument" - is that the kind of > thing you think could change? > > There is the "@xrefautomaticsectiontitle on" option, which may give some > of what you are looking for. That’s a nice feature I was unaware of, thanks! But that’s not my point. I’m claiming that the name of the section would be a better <title> than the node name. Cheers!
