Ah, got it. I think there should be another flag to ignore the inode values, would extend the tool’s features. What do you think? I haven’t looked at the source code but believe that it shouldn’t be too difficult. Would be happy to pick this up.
On Tue, 20 Jun 2023 at 12:42 PM, Sergey Poznyakoff <[email protected]> wrote: > Yakul Garg <[email protected]> ha escrit: > > > But since I am passing --no-check-device, shouldn't the invocation > > ignore the inode attribute of the files when checking for modified > > files? > > It disables only the first part of the identifying pair: device number. > Inode numbers are compared anyway. > > Regards, > Sergey > -- Regards, *Yakul Garg* *Contact: +91-816-725-2222**Linkedin <https://www.linkedin.com/in/yakul-garg-32184391/>*
