‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Am 6. März 2018 11:28 PM schrieb Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]>:
> > Thank you for the elaborate response Dmitry! > > Your are welcome. > > But, I see, you preferred to move our dialogue off-list. As I found nothing > private in it, that was probably for the reason that it went somewhat > off-topic there. However, I would say that this topic important enough to be > public, and hope that LibreJS developers and other subscribers will excuse > us. If they know any better list to discuss that (I, alas, do not), I would > appreciate that info. > > For now, I took a liberty to move it back to [email protected] by > resending your message and continuing there. > Right, thanks for that. I'm not used to using maillists, this is why I'm prone to clicking on "reply" instead of "reply all". > Sounds nice. I would definitely like to see it, when it’s published (in the > case it’s in English or Russian). English, Russian and German. The site is going to have all 3 languages. If all goes well, I can finish it in a week or two. www.zobin-online.de is the domain, in any case it should be live before end of march. > Not pushing any programs at all would not contradict anything — that is the > point, I was trying to emphasize. Yes, not pushing any programs at all would be a solution. It seems this might be the solution I'll go with. > I was under impression that after CSS3 (and 4) there no much need in > client-side javascripts to implement some fun animations. I guess I'm still stuck in the past then? If CSS3 and 4 allow some logic to be executed on events like onmouseover, I'll look into them of course. > Well, AFAIK, Git should work over WebDAV also. And nothing, of course, can > prevent you from treating a website hosted along with its VC repo as a mere > bunch of files and use any protocol your hoster allows, even FTP, from any > place. I'm not hosting it in a VirtualCenter (if that's what you mean by VC?), but rather at home, on a Raspberry Pi. No problem with remote ftp or even ssh if there is a need for it. > So, if you were going to bother with LibreJS labels even for it, then, for > instance, Kalithea \[https://kallithea-scm.org\], while not providing them > out of a box, might look like an easy target: its javascript, as far as I > see, are served in sources (except jQuery), static and with human-readable > labels already. Thanks, kalithea sounds interesting. I'm too far into building the site with jekyll right now, but I'll definitely take a look on kalithea. > > > and at the same time the whole website appears to be (on the client > > > > side) only static .html files. > > So there will be no any posting (commenting, etc) facilities for a random > visitor? Then you really do not need any ‘management system’ at all. Some > system for building HTML (plus CSS, plus RSS/Atom, plus whatever) from > sources (in Texinfo, Org, some simplified HTML, whatever else), that is so > called ‘static site generator’, would be enough. I'd like to have commenting abilities for random visitors. While jekyll really is more of a 'static site generator', there are plugins for administration purposes, so that the "content" can be "managed" remotely through a webinterface (adding new posts for example). With login and all that jazz. There is also a plugin for allowing the commenting and discussion of posts, I'd like to include it at least in the future, maybe even right from the start. So the line between a simple static site generator and a full-blooded CMS begins to blur right about there. > Indeed, Dr. Stallman was quite right by awarding that word combination with > his “prize for vacuity”: Yes, the term CMS is indeed quite vague.
