On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 02:59:24PM -0300, Ivan Jager wrote:
> > I am also saying that those goals ar enot orthogonal. The Hurd is flexible
^^^^^^^^^^ That should say exclusive
Ooops.
> > enough to carry both. And, as a last note, the fourthe set of permissions is
> > a logical consequence of the fact that the Hurd users have uid and gid
> > *sets*, which might be empty.
>
> Does that mean the ACLs could be stored the same way, but they would be
> interpreted differently?
I don't know how to implement ACLs in the Hurd.
> I think I need to do some more reading... Where is that explained?
In the Hurd source.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
_______________________________________________
Help-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
